1 |
James wrote: |
2 |
> Dale <rdalek1967 <at> gmail.com> writes: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> After I do a major upgrade or --emptytree, I switch to boot runlevel, |
5 |
>> check with checkrestart and restart whatever it reports needs it. |
6 |
>> Generally, switching to boot runlevel catches most everything. |
7 |
> OK, so I emerge checkrestart and ran it. And there are almost a dozen things |
8 |
> it says need a reboot (mostly lxde). "These processes do not seem to have an |
9 |
> associated init script to restart them". |
10 |
> |
11 |
> So I have to reboot anyways. Oh, the url on the "checkrestart" script |
12 |
> now points to some advertisement that is unrelated, to a bug needs to |
13 |
> be file to the github location? I did not know if this is the best new |
14 |
> link, so I did not file this bug on checkrestart. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> ******************* |
19 |
>> Yea, rebooting may be faster but I hate rebooting all the time. :/ |
20 |
> Agreeded. But after a gcc update, I think it wise, especially since |
21 |
> gcc-4.9 cometh....soon? |
22 |
> |
23 |
>> Dale |
24 |
> thx, |
25 |
> James |
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
If checkrestart says there is no init scripts to restart the process, |
30 |
odds are you don't need to really worry about it. That said, I use htop |
31 |
to find out what is running and do what I can to restart them anyway. |
32 |
Usually when I get that message, restarting udev or lvmetad gives me a |
33 |
clean output. |
34 |
|
35 |
Usually if a gcc is released that requires all this, it is well known. |
36 |
Any gotchas related to gcc will spread like fire. There is to many |
37 |
people using gcc for something of that nature to sneak by plus the |
38 |
coders usually know this and make it known as well. It's been a good |
39 |
while since the rebuilding of everything has been required. I tend to |
40 |
do it myself but I don't get my hands to dirty over the deal. I usually |
41 |
do it the next time there is a KDE upgrade or something since that |
42 |
rebuilds a lot of packages anyway. |
43 |
|
44 |
Just something to ponder on. ;-) |
45 |
|
46 |
Dale |
47 |
|
48 |
:-) :-) |