Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse???

[Zeerak Waseem]

The eix-remote -q  update command should take care of that. Try running it  
and searching for something that you know isn't in one of the overlays  
that you use :-)

On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:58:44 +0100, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>  
wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 12:27:12 Neil Bothwick wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without
>> installing
>> the overlay first
>>
>> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays
>
> Yes, thanks Alan. That is what I was asking. I guess I should have
> posted that eix subsclipse showed nothing on my machines:
>
> dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse
> No matches found.
> dragonfly ~ #
>
> After adding the trauma overlay with layman now I see it:
>
> dragonfly ~ # layman -l
> * trauma                    [Subversion]
> (http://svn.digital-trauma.de/gentoo/trunk/               )
> dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse
> * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1]
>      Available versions:  1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s
>      Homepage:            http://subclipse.tigris.org/
>      Description:         Subversion support for Eclipse (binary)
>
> [1] "digital-trauma.de" /usr/local/portage/layman/trauma
> dragonfly ~ #
>
> but how do I determine that it's in trauma in the first place?
>
> This came up the other day where Grant was asking about rt-sources and
> I was able to answer because I use it and knew which overlay to tell
> him to add, but then I hit the wall myself and didn't know how to
> figure this out short of adding all overlays which seemed silly.
>
> I had hoped that layman would have a way to search non-installed
> overlays but I didn't find that so I asked here.
>
> And thanks to Neil who at least told me what overlay had a binary
> version. Unfortunately it appears it an older version of subclipse
> that's not intended for use with eclipse-3.5.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>