| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 12:27:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:53:20 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 4 |
>> > What are the commands to find out if subclipse is supported through an |
| 5 |
>> > overlay? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> [root@zaphod ~ 0]% eix subclipse |
| 8 |
>> * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1] |
| 9 |
>> Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s |
| 10 |
>> Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/ |
| 11 |
>> Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary) |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> [1] "digital-trauma.de" layman/trauma |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> You need to run eix-remote -q update to have layman overlays added to the |
| 16 |
>> eix database. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without installing |
| 20 |
> the overlay first |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Yes, thanks Alan. That is what I was asking. I guess I should have |
| 25 |
posted that eix subsclipse showed nothing on my machines: |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse |
| 28 |
No matches found. |
| 29 |
dragonfly ~ # |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
After adding the trauma overlay with layman now I see it: |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
dragonfly ~ # layman -l |
| 34 |
* trauma [Subversion] |
| 35 |
(http://svn.digital-trauma.de/gentoo/trunk/ ) |
| 36 |
dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse |
| 37 |
* dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1] |
| 38 |
Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s |
| 39 |
Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/ |
| 40 |
Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary) |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
[1] "digital-trauma.de" /usr/local/portage/layman/trauma |
| 43 |
dragonfly ~ # |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
but how do I determine that it's in trauma in the first place? |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
This came up the other day where Grant was asking about rt-sources and |
| 48 |
I was able to answer because I use it and knew which overlay to tell |
| 49 |
him to add, but then I hit the wall myself and didn't know how to |
| 50 |
figure this out short of adding all overlays which seemed silly. |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
I had hoped that layman would have a way to search non-installed |
| 53 |
overlays but I didn't find that so I asked here. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
And thanks to Neil who at least told me what overlay had a binary |
| 56 |
version. Unfortunately it appears it an older version of subclipse |
| 57 |
that's not intended for use with eclipse-3.5. |
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
Thanks, |
| 60 |
Mark |
Archives