| 1 |
Mark Knecht ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> It seems that over the last few months that the 'Updating portage |
| 4 |
> cache' part of an emerge sync has gotten very, very low on my |
| 5 |
> machines. Has anything changed that should have caused this? Did I |
| 6 |
> possibly miss some update step somewhere to make this run faster. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'd say that this step is now taking at least 10 minutes - maybe 15 |
| 9 |
> minutes. Good reason not to update too often! |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I do think the speed at which emerge gets to this point is a bit |
| 12 |
> faster, and certainly I'd expect it to slow down a bit as the library |
| 13 |
> grows ever larger. I see no change at all in emerging a package - only |
| 14 |
> the sync step. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Thanks in advance for any info. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Cheers, |
| 19 |
> Mark |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
maybe this can interest you |
| 22 |
"Cache rewrite backport" |
| 23 |
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/1105 |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives