| 1 |
On 9/19/05, Nagatoro <nagatoro@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Don't remember the bug number but the solution is in bugzilla (search |
| 4 |
> for gnome 2.12 applet). If I recall correctly you need to reemerge a |
| 5 |
> certain package. (btw Gnome 2.12 looks good! :) ) |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I did file a bug, and was marked as a duplicate of this one: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104820 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Quoting the bug: |
| 13 |
> ------- *Additional Comment #3<http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104820#c3>From Simon |
| 14 |
Stelling <blubb@g.o> 2005-09-05 09:47 PDT |
| 15 |
[reply<http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104820#add_comment>] |
| 16 |
------- * |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> looks like upgrading gtk+ to 2.8.3-r1 solved this issue too... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I'll upgrade gtk+ when I am at home, and will return in case it still |
| 22 |
doesn't work. |
| 23 |
I don't know why, but I never make to find a bug on bugzilla based on some |
| 24 |
keywords. For example, if I search now for 'gnome applet', this bug doesn't |
| 25 |
appear in search results. However, numerous unrelated bugs happen to be in |
| 26 |
the results. Very strange. |
| 27 |
And yes, gnome-2.12 does look good! |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Bruno Lustosa, aka Lofofora | Email: bruno@×××××××.net |
| 31 |
Network Administrator/Web Programmer | ICQ: 1406477 |
| 32 |
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil | |
Archives