Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:05:54
Message-Id: sq1pj4-s7m.ln1@goldry.remarqs.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid by "Hemmann
1 In <news:200706081440.37381.volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>,
2 "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote:
3
4 > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
5 > > b.n. <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote:
6 > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get
7 > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong.
8 > >
9 > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub?
10 >
11 > I did.
12 >
13 > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized the
14 > bug as a real bug...
15
16 I've seen that happen a few times. IME, jakub is usually right, but
17 whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn. It's possible to
18 wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it,
19 instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices.
20
21 --
22 »Q«
23
24 --
25 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies