| 1 |
On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: |
| 2 |
> In <news:200706081440.37381.volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de>, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <volker.armin.hemmann@××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > b.n. <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get |
| 8 |
> > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I did. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized the |
| 15 |
> > bug as a real bug... |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I've seen that happen a few times. IME, jakub is usually right, but |
| 18 |
> whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn. It's possible to |
| 19 |
> wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it, |
| 20 |
> instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Jakub is like a spam filter who filters out 100% of the spam. Sadly, he |
| 23 |
filters a fair amount of ham too - and if your ham got filtered the option to |
| 24 |
get it recognized as ham are hard to find and not easy to use ;) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
His user interface could be improved.... |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives