| 1 |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Nov 28, 2011 10:38 PM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> > Won't file a bug report, though. I have a feeling that my bug report re: |
| 8 |
>> > emerge failure will be marked WONTFIX thanks to the 'ricer special' |
| 9 |
>> > CFLAGS |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> The CFLAGS you showed me weren't any more ricer than "-O2 |
| 12 |
>> -march=native". (I didn't know that -D_FORTIFY=2 came from gcc) |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> They wouldn't have a leg to stand on... |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Mine is: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -floop-interchange |
| 20 |
> -floop-strip-mine -floop-block -funsafe-math-optimizations |
| 21 |
> -fexcess-precision=fast" |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> If you tell me that's not a ricer's CFLAGS, then you've just made me a very |
| 24 |
> happy cat :-) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Rgds, |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I wonder if someone in this thread will help me understand the term |
| 30 |
'ricer'. The only origin I know of this term, from the car world, is |
| 31 |
really pretty racist, so I wonder if there isn't a more genteel origin |
| 32 |
I simply cannot find using Google? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
- Mark |
Archives