1 |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Nov 28, 2011 10:38 PM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> > Won't file a bug report, though. I have a feeling that my bug report re: |
9 |
>>> > emerge failure will be marked WONTFIX thanks to the 'ricer special' |
10 |
>>> > CFLAGS |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> The CFLAGS you showed me weren't any more ricer than "-O2 |
13 |
>>> -march=native". (I didn't know that -D_FORTIFY=2 came from gcc) |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> They wouldn't have a leg to stand on... |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Mine is: |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -floop-interchange |
21 |
>> -floop-strip-mine -floop-block -funsafe-math-optimizations |
22 |
>> -fexcess-precision=fast" |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> If you tell me that's not a ricer's CFLAGS, then you've just made me a very |
25 |
>> happy cat :-) |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>> Rgds, |
28 |
>> |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I wonder if someone in this thread will help me understand the term |
31 |
> 'ricer'. The only origin I know of this term, from the car world, is |
32 |
> really pretty racist, so I wonder if there isn't a more genteel origin |
33 |
> I simply cannot find using Google? |
34 |
> |
35 |
> - Mark |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
Ricer is used to refer to someone who wants to have the system tweaked |
40 |
to the hardware it runs on that it is not like the generic binary |
41 |
distros like ubuntu that is compiled for the lowest common denominator |
42 |
like i386 or x86_64. |
43 |
hope this helps clarify the term, |
44 |
James Wall |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
No trees were harmed in the sending of this message. However, a large |
48 |
number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. |