1 |
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, mike@×××××××.us <mike@×××××××.us> wrote: |
2 |
> rsync works just fine with any normal set of options when using any sort |
3 |
> of FAT as a destination. There are, of course, a couple of gotchas: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> - FAT has limitations on file sizes. |
6 |
> - FAT cannot store permissions or ACLs |
7 |
> - FAT does not support extended attributes |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Other than that, though, you should be good. |
10 |
|
11 |
Add "FAT considers two filenames that are the same except for case as |
12 |
the same filename" to that list. NTFS has the same limitation. |
13 |
-- |
14 |
Manuel A. McLure WW1FA <manuel@××××××.org> <http://www.mclure.org> |
15 |
...for in Ulthar, according to an ancient and significant law, |
16 |
no man may kill a cat. -- H.P. Lovecraft |