Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] rsync from ext3 to vfat?
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:23:58
Message-Id: CA+czFiBbnxmNOdc2NAV2F=UgpG2ArmGgE=gQptVX_3UAdN7EWw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] rsync from ext3 to vfat? by Manuel McLure
1 On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Manuel McLure <manuel@××××××.org> wrote:
2 > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, mike@×××××××.us <mike@×××××××.us> wrote:
3 >> rsync works just fine with any normal set of options when using any sort
4 >> of FAT as a destination.  There are, of course, a couple of gotchas:
5 >>
6 >>  - FAT has limitations on file sizes.
7 >>  - FAT cannot store permissions or ACLs
8 >>  - FAT does not support extended attributes
9 >>
10 >> Other than that, though, you should be good.
11 >
12 > Add "FAT considers two filenames that are the same except for case as
13 > the same filename" to that list. NTFS has the same limitation.
14
15 No. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/100625
16
17 However, ntfs-3g only creates files in the POSIX namespace on NTFS,
18 which means that, depending on the filename, some files you create on
19 Linux won't be able to be opened by apps (such as the Windows shell)
20 that rely on assumptions not violated by the DOS and Win32 namespaces.
21
22 I ran into that one. >.>
23
24 --
25 :wq