1 |
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Manuel McLure <manuel@××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, mike@×××××××.us <mike@×××××××.us> wrote: |
3 |
>> rsync works just fine with any normal set of options when using any sort |
4 |
>> of FAT as a destination. There are, of course, a couple of gotchas: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> - FAT has limitations on file sizes. |
7 |
>> - FAT cannot store permissions or ACLs |
8 |
>> - FAT does not support extended attributes |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Other than that, though, you should be good. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Add "FAT considers two filenames that are the same except for case as |
13 |
> the same filename" to that list. NTFS has the same limitation. |
14 |
|
15 |
No. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/100625 |
16 |
|
17 |
However, ntfs-3g only creates files in the POSIX namespace on NTFS, |
18 |
which means that, depending on the filename, some files you create on |
19 |
Linux won't be able to be opened by apps (such as the Windows shell) |
20 |
that rely on assumptions not violated by the DOS and Win32 namespaces. |
21 |
|
22 |
I ran into that one. >.> |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
:wq |