1 |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> I don't like package managers which require interactivity. |
4 |
>> emerge -uvDp world | less is easier to parse then emerge -upDa world. |
5 |
>> Why? Because I don't have to find a way of transferring <return> if |
6 |
>> less handles all of the keyboard input. |
7 |
>> So I prefer two stages: |
8 |
>> 1) pretend merge - single verbosity - and look at output |
9 |
>> 2) actual merge - normal / quiet - and pipe to tee |
10 |
> |
11 |
> So what you're saying... is that emerge should have a switch to turn |
12 |
> on, when using -p, -a, and/or -t, a pager? Particularly one that, |
13 |
> until you're content with -a in particular, doesn't accidentally have |
14 |
> a means of handing output back off to the emerge for the yes/no? This |
15 |
Yes. |
16 |
> would spare the double run of the dependency checker while giving |
17 |
> users who want it a pager to use and giving the rest the same |
18 |
> functionality a simple -a gives now... something like etc-update's use |
19 |
> of a pager comes to mind. Let's see... -P is taken for --prune ... |
20 |
> --less/-L or... --more/-m ... --more/-M ? Of course, --pager/-M would |
21 |
> work too, but it's less intuitive (we already have --unmerge/-C ... so |
22 |
> why not, I suppose). Not *quite* sure I'm up to the task at the |
23 |
> moment, though. |
24 |
|
25 |
But I usually use emerge -p > file in order to see the difference in |
26 |
dependencies from testing USE flags. |
27 |
I would always choose -pN over -aN. |
28 |
|
29 |
Where's the portage to-do list? |
30 |
If you can find it, add these two items: |
31 |
fix the uname |
32 |
add pager support for -p, -a, -t |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Andrey Vul |
38 |
|
39 |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
40 |
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
41 |
A: Top-posting. |
42 |
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? |