| 1 |
On Monday 06 December 2004 13:53, Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 2 |
> So there it |
| 3 |
> was in both, and (except for my current snd-seq-oss problem, |
| 4 |
> which I think I know how to fix), I've never had any problems |
| 5 |
> with it the way you would expect if it was "wrong" to do-- no |
| 6 |
> errors that I've noticed in either run; certainly no errors in |
| 7 |
> the 'default' run (where you would think to see them). |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I do think that this works because some ALSA modules really |
| 10 |
> prefer to be modules under udev, but some flatly cannot-- for |
| 11 |
> example, snd-seq-oss cannot be a module (despite what the Help |
| 12 |
> says), but snd-seq (on which snd-seq-oss depends), can. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Hi Holly, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Have you looked at this? |
| 17 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72099 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Peter |
| 21 |
======================================================================== |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.51-r3. kernel-2.6.9-gentoo-r9. |
| 23 |
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. gcc(GCC): 3.3.4. |
| 24 |
KDE: 3.3.1. Qt: 3.3.3. |
| 25 |
======================================================================== |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives