| 1 |
Peter Ruskin wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 06 December 2004 13:53, Holly Bostick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>So there it |
| 5 |
>>was in both, and (except for my current snd-seq-oss problem, |
| 6 |
>>which I think I know how to fix), I've never had any problems |
| 7 |
>>with it the way you would expect if it was "wrong" to do-- no |
| 8 |
>>errors that I've noticed in either run; certainly no errors in |
| 9 |
>>the 'default' run (where you would think to see them). |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>I do think that this works because some ALSA modules really |
| 12 |
>>prefer to be modules under udev, but some flatly cannot-- for |
| 13 |
>>example, snd-seq-oss cannot be a module (despite what the Help |
| 14 |
>>says), but snd-seq (on which snd-seq-oss depends), can. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Hi Holly, |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Have you looked at this? |
| 20 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72099 |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Thanks, Peter-- I knew there was something going on with snd-seq-oss, |
| 24 |
but couldn't remember what. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I actually haven't upgraded module-init-tools for that reason, but I |
| 27 |
still get a message that the sequencer module fails to load during boot. |
| 28 |
System boots otherwise fine, but not having a sequencer, or kinda half |
| 29 |
having one makes things yet a bit more flaky on my system (and my system |
| 30 |
is truly flakey enough atm without this as well). |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
But I appreciate being reminded of the details of that particular |
| 33 |
circumstance. I'm having a bit of trouble atm keeping track of all the |
| 34 |
broken things and why. I side with the guy who said his computer hates |
| 35 |
him and he was going to take it out and shoot it.... everything was |
| 36 |
going just fine before it took one step too far ;-( ... and left no |
| 37 |
footprints.... |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Holly |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives