| 1 |
On Nov 26, 2011 5:05 AM, "Neil Bothwick" <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:12:42 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > I don't use LVM but I suspect that on this list that would be the #1 |
| 6 |
> > > recommendation to take care of the numbers question. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Everytime I read some guide on LVM, my eyes becomes blurry, the room |
| 9 |
> > starts spinning, and I can hear wolves howling ... :D |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Seriously, LVM looks mighty nice, but it also looks (and is!) mighty |
| 12 |
> > complex. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> It may look it, but you only have to learn the concepts once. That many |
| 15 |
> physical partitions will be extra work forever, imagine what happens when |
| 16 |
> one of the middle ones is no longer big enough. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Seriously, spend half an hour reading up on LVM and you'll never regret |
| 19 |
> it. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Oh, I certainly will. But not now. I need to get this box up, staged, and |
| 23 |
productioned ASAP. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Afterwards, I'll commit myself to understanding LVM. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Rgds, |
Archives