Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64?
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:03:13
Message-Id: 58965d8a0905032159i66d62e14u4b11ba1f5bc2e6d7@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64? by "Arttu V."
1 On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > walt wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Could someone else compile the test and confirm that it returns 119 on
5 >> ~amd64 instead of 0?
6 >
7 > It returns 119 on an semi-ancient Athlon64 3200+ box here as well.
8 >
9 > Could kernel HZ-settings affect the outcome? This box has CONFIG_HZ=250, but
10 > tomorrow I can try on another amd64 which runs a 1000HZ kernel IIRC.
11
12 Also 119 here. I use NO_HZ option.
13
14 Also, ksystraycmd from KDE4 has segfault in nanosleep every time,
15 forever. Maybe it's related?