Archives
Archives
| From: | "Arttu V." <arttuv69@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 04 May 2009 08:17:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 49FE1F29.1070706@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64? by walt |
||
| 1 | walt wrote: |
| 2 | > Could someone else compile the test and confirm that it returns 119 on |
| 3 | > ~amd64 instead of 0? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | It returns 119 on an semi-ancient Athlon64 3200+ box here as well. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Could kernel HZ-settings affect the outcome? This box has CONFIG_HZ=250, |
| 8 | but tomorrow I can try on another amd64 which runs a 1000HZ kernel IIRC. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Arttu V. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: nanosleep broken on ~amd64? | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64? | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |