Archives
Archives
| From: | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: nanosleep broken on ~amd64? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 04 May 2009 08:12:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | gtlhtq$836$2@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64? by "Arttu V." |
||
| 1 | Arttu V. wrote: |
| 2 | > walt wrote: |
| 3 | >> Could someone else compile the test and confirm that it returns 119 on |
| 4 | >> ~amd64 instead of 0? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > It returns 119 on an semi-ancient Athlon64 3200+ box here as well. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Could kernel HZ-settings affect the outcome? This box has CONFIG_HZ=250, |
| 9 | > but tomorrow I can try on another amd64 which runs a 1000HZ kernel IIRC. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | 119 here on AMD64 with a not-so-ancient Core 2 Duo and a kernel timer of |
| 12 | 1000Hz (gentoo-sources-2.6.28-r5). |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: nanosleep broken on ~amd64? | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> |