| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> Arttu V. wrote: |
| 3 |
>> walt wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Could someone else compile the test and confirm that it returns 119 on |
| 5 |
>>> ~amd64 instead of 0? |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> It returns 119 on an semi-ancient Athlon64 3200+ box here as well. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Could kernel HZ-settings affect the outcome? This box has |
| 10 |
>> CONFIG_HZ=250, but tomorrow I can try on another amd64 which runs a |
| 11 |
>> 1000HZ kernel IIRC. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> 119 here on AMD64 with a not-so-ancient Core 2 Duo and a kernel timer of |
| 14 |
> 1000Hz (gentoo-sources-2.6.28-r5). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
OK, compiling with "gcc -m32 nanotest.c" (-m32 compiles it as 32-bit on |
| 17 |
multilib Gentoo) returns 0. Maybe a bug in glibc? |
Archives