Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] python 3.1 safe as default python?
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:47:35
Message-Id: 1249231608.21216.2.camel@centar
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] python 3.1 safe as default python? by Doug Hunley
1 On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0400, Doug Hunley wrote:
2 > I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with
3 > python 3.1 (I run ~x86).
4
5 It doesn't "replace" 2.6.2. It's slotted.
6
7 > Is it safe to do so or will portage (and
8 > everything else) freak out?
9
10 I would think (hope) that the python maintainers were smart enough to
11 know whether installing Python 3 would break portage. Then again, this
12 is Gentoo ;-)
13
14 > If it is, in fact, safe are there any
15 > extra (special) steps needed to ensure continued operation of things?
16 > Thanks.
17
18 >From the ebuild's post-install:
19
20 WARNING!
21 Many Python modules haven't been ported yet to Python 3.*.
22 /usr/bin/python hasn't been updated and still references your
23 old Python installation.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: python 3.1 safe as default python? Christer Ekholm <che@××××××.se>