Archives
Archives
| From: | Doug Hunley <doug@×××××××××××××.net> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] python 3.1 safe as default python? |
| Date: | Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:17:24 |
| Message-Id: | 7284e2210908020817g1015ed0aw3086d32d7936e1a4@mail.gmail.com |
| 1 | I noticed that my 'emerge world' wants to replace python 2.6.2 with |
| 2 | python 3.1 (I run ~x86). Is it safe to do so or will portage (and |
| 3 | everything else) freak out? If it is, in fact, safe are there any |
| 4 | extra (special) steps needed to ensure continued operation of things? |
| 5 | Thanks. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | -- |
| 8 | Douglas J Hunley, RHCT |
| 9 | doug.hunley@×××××.com : http://douglasjhunley.com : Twitter: @hunleyd |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Obsessively opposed to the typical. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: python 3.1 safe as default python? | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] python 3.1 safe as default python? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] python 3.1 safe as default python? | Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org> |