1 |
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 20:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 18:40:12 M Daniel R M wrote: |
3 |
> > Konqueror: very stable indeed, but it couldn't be at another way since |
4 |
> > it's a key piece of the KDE environment... The problem comes when I want |
5 |
> > to fill in forms (you know... web pages for registering, etc.). It stops |
6 |
> > many times without giving us an alert message or some kind of |
7 |
> > explanation, so you have to deduce that the problem is not from the |
8 |
> > website, but the browser instead. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I don't know whether problems come from java or whatever..., I've |
11 |
> > checked my konqueror preferences and I'd bet they are all OK.. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> javascript support in konqueror sucks. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
I always thought that here it isn't my fault (that is, incomplete |
17 |
installs and so on..) |
18 |
|
19 |
> For everything else it's actually OK. One of these days it will use webkit as |
20 |
> the backend and then things might improve. Until then, I'm afraid you are SOL. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
ASAP, please! |
24 |
|
25 |
I think konqueror lacks of such abilities, and they are practically |
26 |
essential nowadays, but apart from that..., other capabilities are fine |
27 |
IMHO (speed, stability, ...). Ops! In addition, I realize now that |
28 |
sometimes konqueror renders (shows) some webpages badly (you know, |
29 |
things placed in the frame where they shouldn't, etc.) |
30 |
|
31 |
Regards, |
32 |
|
33 |
Daniel R. Magarzo |