| 1 |
On Freitag 13 November 2009, Igor wrote: |
| 2 |
> В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 05:38:24 автор Nikos Chantziaras |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> написал: |
| 5 |
> > On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin |
| 7 |
> > > Hemmann |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > написал: |
| 10 |
> > >> [...] |
| 11 |
> > >> yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow the |
| 12 |
> > >> instructions. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > I strictly follow the instructions. But "emerge: there are no ebuilds |
| 15 |
> > > to satisfy "=x11-base/xorg-server-1.6.3.901-r99"." |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Volker's instructions work, but the overlay method is more complicated |
| 18 |
> > than it needs to be. You can find an easier method of applying the |
| 19 |
> > patch here: |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-794699.html |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > This has the benefit that it works with all versions of X.Org and not |
| 24 |
> > just with 1.6.3 and you don't need a custom ebuild in your local overlay. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > Note that the patch we're talking about does *not* fix the CPU load on |
| 27 |
> > moving windows; ati-drivers are just too slow with this operation. It |
| 28 |
> > only fixes the resizing, maximizing and opening of new windows. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Thank you. But i have question about this patch. Why ati driver is very |
| 31 |
> slow in X.Org? Is it bug ati driver or X.Org? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
as I wrote before, 'they' changed X a long time ago for intel drivers and |
| 35 |
screwed over everybody else. So it is X fault - but X devs put the fingers in |
| 36 |
their ears, say it is everybody's else fault and sing lalala. |
Archives