| 1 |
В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 05:38:24 автор Nikos Chantziaras |
| 2 |
написал: |
| 3 |
> On 11/12/2009 11:55 PM, Igor wrote: |
| 4 |
> > В сообщении от Пятница 13 ноября 2009 00:30:35 автор Volker Armin Hemmann |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > написал: |
| 7 |
> >> [...] |
| 8 |
> >> yeah, unpacking in /usr/portage is completly wrong. Just follow the |
| 9 |
> >> instructions. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I strictly follow the instructions. But "emerge: there are no ebuilds to |
| 12 |
> > satisfy "=x11-base/xorg-server-1.6.3.901-r99"." |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Volker's instructions work, but the overlay method is more complicated |
| 15 |
> than it needs to be. You can find an easier method of applying the |
| 16 |
> patch here: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-794699.html |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> This has the benefit that it works with all versions of X.Org and not |
| 21 |
> just with 1.6.3 and you don't need a custom ebuild in your local overlay. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Note that the patch we're talking about does *not* fix the CPU load on |
| 24 |
> moving windows; ati-drivers are just too slow with this operation. It |
| 25 |
> only fixes the resizing, maximizing and opening of new windows. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Thank you. But i have question about this patch. Why ati driver is very slow |
| 28 |
in X.Org? Is it bug ati driver or X.Org? |
Archives