1 |
On Samstag, 9. August 2008, Filipe Sousa wrote: |
2 |
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
3 |
> > Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Volker already mentioned the driver problem. If you wonder *why* the |
6 |
> > drivers are broken: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > GeForce 8xxx and 9xxx series almost completely lack 2D acceleration |
9 |
> > hardware. The 3D engine of the hardware must be used to render 2D stuff |
10 |
> > (including video). NVidia has not really implemented this for their |
11 |
> > Linux drivers yet. Right now, GeForce 5, 6 and 7 series is much faster |
12 |
> > with 2D on linux than GeForce 8 and 9. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I have one 8800gt and 7300 and the 7300 it's not faster than 8800. Using |
15 |
> xrender is slow and the opengl render is not better. The ATI on my |
16 |
> laptop isn't any better. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Both kde 4 and qt 4 are terribly slow with graphics. |
19 |
|
20 |
from the threads I posted it should be clear that kde4/qt4 are not the only |
21 |
ones affected. gtk is slow too. So is firefox. On Intel integrated graphics, |
22 |
qt4/kde4 is fast and fluid. That should give someone food for thought. |
23 |
|
24 |
I bought an Ati because I was fed up - and while it is not perfect, it is so |
25 |
much better that I am glad that I did the jump. Using xshm instead of xv for |
26 |
video is a small price, for not having to wait several seconds until the |
27 |
desktop reacts on a right mouse click or have krunner work as soon as it is |
28 |
open. |
29 |
|
30 |
Also the 7300 is a bad example - it is a very slow card. And the big 8 and 9 |
31 |
cards hide some of the slowness because they are so powerfull that it makes up |
32 |
for some of the shitty drivers. |
33 |
|
34 |
The worst part - Nvidia knows about this for ages - and nothing happend. |