1 |
John J. Foster schreef: |
2 |
> Good morning all, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've been running the binary versions of oo for about three months |
5 |
> now, while waiting for v2.0 to become stable. It looks pretty close |
6 |
> to me. I'd very much like to run the regular build procedures, but am |
7 |
> quite worried about what the pulling in of Gnome dependencies will |
8 |
> do do my stable KDE system. About six months ago I installed whatever |
9 |
> version of the Gnome desktop that was stable then, but ended up |
10 |
> spending 3 or 4 days trying to remove all remnants of it after I |
11 |
> decided that I didn't really like it that well. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Am I being overly concerned here, or are that legitimate problems I |
14 |
> may encounter? |
15 |
|
16 |
Does offering to compile -gnome make any difference to the proposed build? |
17 |
|
18 |
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge -pv openoffice |
19 |
|
20 |
These are the packages that I would merge, in order: |
21 |
|
22 |
Calculating dependencies ...done! |
23 |
[blocks B ] app-office/openoffice-bin (is blocking |
24 |
app-office/openoffice-2.0.0) |
25 |
[ebuild N ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r2 -berkdb -nis -pam_chroot |
26 |
-pam_console -pam_timestamp -pwdb (-selinux) 562 kB |
27 |
[ebuild N ] dev-perl/Archive-Zip-1.16 108 kB |
28 |
[ebuild N ] dev-java/ant-core-1.6.5-r2 -doc -source 6,136 kB |
29 |
[ebuild N ] app-shells/tcsh-6.14-r1 +perl 859 kB |
30 |
[ebuild N ] app-office/openoffice-2.0.0 +curl -eds *+gnome* +java |
31 |
-kde +ldap -mozilla +nas +python +xml2 +zlib 209,311 kB |
32 |
|
33 |
I use the -bin, as you can see, and I don't really use ACCEPT_KEYWORDS |
34 |
on the command line (because that's A Bad Thing), but I just wanted to |
35 |
quickly see if the 2.0 version of openoffice had a +gnome keyword, and |
36 |
it does (the stable version doesn't). |
37 |
|
38 |
That said, I don't see what the GNOME libs are likely to 'do' to your |
39 |
KDE system-- more likely less damage than the KDE libs generally do to my |
40 |
mostly-GNOME based system, and much less damage than the proposed |
41 |
addition of PAM does to almost any system, ime. What exactly are you worried |
42 |
might happen? |
43 |
|
44 |
Holly |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |