Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 08:04:48
Message-Id: 20120524095942.75519324@khamul.example.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [entirely ON topic] Thanks to the devs by kwkhui@hkbn.net
1 On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:16:51 +0800
2 kwkhui@××××.net wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, 24 May 2012 02:03:07 +0200
5 > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >
7 > > On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:42:15 -0700
8 > > walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote:
9 > >
10 > > > On 05/23/2012 12:10 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
11 > > > > I've noticed a lot of overt participation on this list by gentoo
12 > > > > devs[1], especially in scenarios where they're explaining
13 > > > > rationales and reasoning behind changes that affect users.
14 > > > >
15 > > > > I'd just like to say thank you for the work you guys do.
16 > > > >
17 > > > > Thank you for the work you guys do.
18 > > >
19 > > > I posted the same, but a long time ago, so I'll add a mee too.
20 >
21 > Another me too.
22 >
23 > > > (Thanking the suse devs here would of course be very
24 > > > inappropriate ;)
25 > >
26 > > But then you'd be excluding gregkh and *that* would be very
27 > > inappropriate ;-)
28 >
29 > Is gregkh still a SUSE dev? I thought he now works for Linux
30 > Foundation (since February).
31
32
33 He did mention on his blog at the time he wanted to continue working on
34 SuSE and Gentoo kernels. As for what he is actually doing these day, I
35 don't know
36
37
38 --
39 Alan McKinnnon
40 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com