1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 11/11/2014 04:03 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
5 |
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:19:36 +0000 (UTC), James wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Agreeded. But after a gcc update, I think it wise, especially |
8 |
>> since gcc-4.9 cometh....soon? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Yes, things may be a little different with 4.9, but the last time a |
11 |
> rebuild was really required was,AFAIR, somewhere around 3.3. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
The last time a rebuild of (almost) everything was required was when |
16 |
the C++ ABI changed, with the associated bump of SONAME from |
17 |
libstdc++.so.5 (provided with GCC 3.3 and earlier) to libstdc++.so.6 |
18 |
(provided with GCC 3.4 and later). So you were close, but the major |
19 |
change happened with 3.4, not 3.3 ;). |
20 |
|
21 |
Some old binary software still requires libstdc++.so.5, which can |
22 |
still be installed from sys-libs/libstdc++-v3, which actually builds |
23 |
part of GCC 3.3.6 to get the libstdc++.so.5 to install. |
24 |
|
25 |
- -- |
26 |
Jonathan Callen |
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
29 |
|
30 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUZYqGAAoJELHSF2kinlg4sTYP/A1f89WjzUi4yqM+ob9XCovU |
31 |
sVbgWS2hW2UL8wDeRuqbQoF6fAtVBLx5J2+akR+TOJN7BQ1fORBOkfOtcdw1vn8l |
32 |
8YZ8LVKSPvB9+EQimuiLGYfWSoVFOwsoc6zL6htFHQhdqb4+O7ceJ1Iqn/PcHxU2 |
33 |
srUnR/Fh5rD1dUch5borZ2Px/g9ivr/91PvTulPIR2940dhregpS+7PyvaZGl2FF |
34 |
Ov8f9ewdf5rDVBZxwzPHpF87dQIOl+0Bxkvr3M1a/yXKxJR38fqSuFI64hlpfln1 |
35 |
uadiytz1WpwEOwK12a36YsnVtenMJFwn2ySnyRGZRL1lltkzHX+RNqLv58lDO4KY |
36 |
jUEx9jBrNfN683X2DKFOkeshlhLHGchnahPTZkW5Vcs7NjTnmbI7V9p5oJkjf59u |
37 |
TftGNb1PTCA9eZYcxpujwkFy+0jiLagbukfxyUqLFMhEt3kTiSBeUVMpCHlBDC3Z |
38 |
XLCGpdj0lX9P6hUGzkz2S8nI/iX7z7MZx/EDtLRo61sE9r7zOQUTYgOISgm2cYge |
39 |
d8nvNguJ3iHESXTeAOu/C+nH+shPelaT62sF7rKUWc0GyudOXmttN9WiSNgN/1nI |
40 |
uuWPcOiP/1hGGl/qkJNrOId+j74lP4ljW3MHjFG+vsVUM+kBHzUFD8gIls2Q6qa4 |
41 |
beea0YeRqT+GLg1XGUvC |
42 |
=5KgF |
43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |