1 |
On 04/26 11:17, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: |
2 |
> On 04/25/2017 10:38 PM, tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
3 |
> > On 04/25 07:38, Floyd Anderson wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Di, 25 Apr 17:47:22 +0200 |
5 |
> > > tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
6 |
> > > > Hi, |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > > currently I am using urxvt as my standard terminal |
9 |
> > > > application, which is FAST and reliable. |
10 |
> > > > But it only emulates 24bit colors if instructed so. |
11 |
> > > > It maps 24bit rgb to 256 color using a fast but not |
12 |
> > > > total correct formula to to do (which is no critism - |
13 |
> > > > its just the way ot is implemented). |
14 |
> > > > |
15 |
> > > > I googled qyite a bit to find 24color terminal |
16 |
> > > > emulators and the one, which came closer to |
17 |
> > > > what I want is sakure. |
18 |
> > > > But comparing the speed of sakura with urxvt |
19 |
> > > > (catting a long log file twice while measureing the time |
20 |
> > > > of the second cat) it shows that sakura needs |
21 |
> > > > six times more time than urxvt. |
22 |
> > > > |
23 |
> > > > Combining this with the compile sessions, which |
24 |
> > > > are one of the core features of Gentoo ;)))... |
25 |
> > > > |
26 |
> > > > What I want is the "fastest" possible (...) |
27 |
> > > > terminal emulator supporting true color (24bit). |
28 |
> > > > I dont need fancy configuring options (two exception: |
29 |
> > > > TABS! and lightweighted) and I dont want KDE stuff (or |
30 |
> > > > any other bloated thing with thousands of dependencies...) |
31 |
> > > > I am simply using openbox. |
32 |
> > > > |
33 |
> > > > What are your experiences? |
34 |
> > > > |
35 |
> > > > Any hint is heartly welcome! Thanks ! |
36 |
> > > > |
37 |
> > > > Cheers |
38 |
> > > > Meino |
39 |
> > > > |
40 |
> > > > PS: The terminal emulator dont need to be part |
41 |
> > > > of Gentoo necessarily...if it is compilable |
42 |
> > > > by a human being withoyt super powers... ;) |
43 |
> > > > |
44 |
> > > I am using rxvt-unicode also as my main terminal emulator. Its true colour |
45 |
> > > emulation bothers me also but just only a little bit. |
46 |
> > > |
47 |
> > > As a second one, xfce4-terminal runs here from time to time (seldom). A |
48 |
> > > quick time/cat test with a gcc-5.4.0 log file (approximately 25 MiB) shows |
49 |
> > > surprisingly that xfce4-terminal runs six time faster than rxvt-unicode. |
50 |
> > > Maybe one reason is that urxvt looks for URLs and email addresses to |
51 |
> > > colourising them. |
52 |
> > > |
53 |
> > > Maybe you can get a suggestion from [1]. |
54 |
> > > |
55 |
> > > |
56 |
> > > References: |
57 |
> > > [1] <https://gist.github.com/XVilka/8346728> |
58 |
> > > |
59 |
> > > -- |
60 |
> > > Regards, |
61 |
> > > floyd |
62 |
> > > |
63 |
> > > |
64 |
> > |
65 |
> > Hi Floyd, |
66 |
> > |
67 |
> > thanks for the informations! :) |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > A few minutes ago I emerged xfce4-terminal and tried the |
70 |
> > cat-time-test of yesterday: 29 secondes with xfce-terminal |
71 |
> > and 5 seconds with urxvt. Hmmmm... |
72 |
> > |
73 |
> > You have got the reversed results compared with mine... |
74 |
> > |
75 |
> > What the heck slows down the output of the terminals on my |
76 |
> > Gentoo and only let urxvt shine? |
77 |
> |
78 |
> Possibly your use flags and/or openbox (if not using a GL compositor). Try |
79 |
> enabling all GL related flags for the terminal emulator and it's |
80 |
> dependencies and use a GL compositor like kwin or compiz. Modern graphics |
81 |
> cards are designed with modern software in mind. Many don't even have a 2D |
82 |
> engine anymore. |
83 |
> |
84 |
> |
85 |
> |
86 |
> > |
87 |
> > Cheers |
88 |
> > Meino |
89 |
> > |
90 |
> > PS: I found XVilka before. That's why I asked for some experiences |
91 |
> > of other users.... :) |
92 |
> > |
93 |
> > |
94 |
> > |
95 |
> > |
96 |
> > |
97 |
> > |
98 |
> > |
99 |
> |
100 |
> |
101 |
> -- |
102 |
> |
103 |
> Fernando Rodriguez |
104 |
> |
105 |
|
106 |
Hi Fernando, |
107 |
|
108 |
thanks for the informations! :) |
109 |
|
110 |
I am not using compiz or such.... |
111 |
|
112 |
Openbox is installed as follows: |
113 |
|
114 |
[I] x11-wm/openbox |
115 |
Available versions: (3) 3.5.2-r1 (~)3.6 3.6.1 **9999 |
116 |
{branding debug imlib nls session startup-notification static-libs svg xdg PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7"} |
117 |
Installed versions: 3.6.1(3)(11:01:40 AM 02/18/2017)(nls session -branding -debug -imlib -startup-notification -static-libs -svg -xdg PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7") |
118 |
Homepage: http://openbox.org/ |
119 |
Description: A standards compliant, fast, light-weight, extensible window manager |
120 |
|
121 |
My USE_FLAGS (make.conf) are: |
122 |
USE="nvidia X lua sdl mp3 flac jack alsa gtk cairo sndfile qt3support kpathsea gif tga jpeg png jpeg2k mad dvb dvdr encode lzo bzip2 ogg sox v4l v4l2 vorbis x264 x265 zsh-completion -hal -lirc" |
123 |
|
124 |
Wpuld you suggest to change a flag? |
125 |
|
126 |
Thanks a lot for any help in advance! |
127 |
|
128 |
Cheers |
129 |
Meino |