Archives
Archives
| From: | Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | sebasmagri@×××××.com | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is a git based tree going to save me bandwidth and time? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:12:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100803211122.0aa20ffb@mosly | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Is a git based tree going to save me bandwidth and time? by sebasmagri@gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Sebasti=C3=A1n_Ram=C3=ADrez_Magr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=AD?=) | ||
| 1 | Hi Sebastián, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I've been thinking about switching from a rsync based tree to a git |
| 4 | > based one cloning [0]. The main reasons because I would do that is in |
| 5 | > order to save bandwidth (I've a slow GSM connection in my netbook and |
| 6 | > I sync two other gentoo boxes from the first one) and maybe time. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | When I had awfully slow internet I used to use app-portage/emerge-delta-webrsync. |
| 9 | emerge-delta-webrsync recreates portage tarball from previous state and patches. |
| 10 | It usually takes about 300KB (one patch size) per day. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Sergei |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-user] Re: Is a git based tree going to save me bandwidth and time? | sebasmagri@gmail.com (=?utf-8?Q?Sebasti=C3=A1n_Ram=C3=ADrez_Magr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=AD?=) |