Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics.
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:06:13
Message-Id: 4E190227.6030901@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics. by Mark Knecht
1 Mark Knecht wrote:
2 > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >
4 >> Mark Knecht wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> And this is exactly why you should consider posting any information
7 >>> your can find on LKML to let the heavy weight guys figure it out. As I
8 >>> said earlier, I believe they will take you quite seriously. In general
9 >>> I would also say that Firefox should be able to cause a kernel panic,
10 >>> and since it is I know the kernel developers are going to be
11 >>> interested in what's the root cause.
12 >>>
13 >>> I don't remember from earlier why you said it was a kernel panic, but
14 >>> clearly it must be. How are you determining this? Do you have info in
15 >>> a terminal? For a few problems I've had I've posted digital photos
16 >>> I've taken and uploaded to FlickR. You might consider doing something
17 >>> similar.
18 >>>
19 >>> Cheers,
20 >>> Mark
21 >>>
22 >>>
23 >>>
24 >>>
25 >> The reason I said kernel panic is because someone else posted that when the
26 >> keyboard lights blink, that is a kernel panic. Sure enough, when Neil told
27 >> me how to set it up so that it would automatically reboot when the kernel
28 >> panics, it does just that. I have no reason to think it is anything other
29 >> than a kernel panic based on nothing but the kernel doing the reboot and the
30 >> lights blinking.
31 >>
32 >> I would like to report this but I wouldn't even know where to start. If I
33 >> had a lot more knowledge on how to help track it down, then that would be
34 >> different. I'm not sure I can help much other than telling them Firefox
35 >> causes a kernel panic but I have no clue how or why.
36 >>
37 >> Then again, if one of the dev would hold my hand a little, I could copy a
38 >> install over to my spare drive and then not have to worry about messing up
39 >> my main install. Fluxbox is OK but I like my KDE better. ;-)
40 >>
41 >> My old rig was in the middle of a update and we just had a nasty little
42 >> thunderstorm here. It was OOo of course. It was 7 hours into a 9 hour
43 >> compile when the lights blinked. My old rig isn't on a UPS anymore. Neat
44 >> huh? I'm glad for the rain tho. My garden needs it really really bad.
45 >>
46 >> Dale
47 >>
48 > Yeah, if you can't report good clear info then it's just a waste of
49 > everyone's time. No need to do that.
50 >
51 > Not sure if it would work or even apply but there are some kernel
52 > features, mostly I think used around boot time, that send kernel info
53 > over either a serial port or more recently an Ethernet link to another
54 > computer which then stays alove and captures whatever data gets
55 > transmitted. If you were interested in learning about that (I am but
56 > haven't had time. I used it years ago to give some LKML guys info they
57 > needed to get an ATI chipset to work better) then we might be able to
58 > dig into that off line.
59 >
60 > On the other hand, if you're machine is working then it ain't broke, right? ;-)
61 >
62 > Cheers,
63 > Mark
64 >
65 >
66 >
67
68 It works as long as I don't open Firefox. If I open Firefox, poof!! No
69 more trapped smoke. lol
70
71 Dale
72
73 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox and kernel panics. Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>