| 1 |
On 9/4/06, Matthew Dawson <matthewjd@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not stable |
| 3 |
> yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I'm not actually using it ATM (I need a .18 kernel for suspend-to-ram |
| 6 |
to work correctly), but I recall it working fine (except for STR) when |
| 7 |
I was using it. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I've looked on google and gentoo bugs, but nothing appears thats useful. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The ChangeLog shows that the only recent activity has been tracking |
| 12 |
the security/bug fixes in the vanilla kernel. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
So I guess what is really needed here is for someone that actually |
| 15 |
uses it to file a stabilization bug request along with the emerge |
| 16 |
--info and some system specs. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-Richard |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives