| 1 |
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 14:52 -0700, Richard Fish wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 9/4/06, Matthew Dawson <matthewjd@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I was just wondering, does anyone know why suspend2-sources-2.6.17 not stable |
| 4 |
> > yet? And if anyone is using it, is it stable enough for general use? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I've been using it ever since it made ~x86, through to the current -r5, |
| 7 |
and it looks fine (as do all kernels recently :) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I've tried radeonfb, vesafb-tng, suspend to disk, and others... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> So I guess what is really needed here is for someone that actually |
| 12 |
> uses it to file a stabilization bug request along with the emerge |
| 13 |
> --info and some system specs. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
done. I've never submitted a stabilisation bug before, but FTFE (first |
| 16 |
time for everything :) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146333 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
cya, |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat. |
| 25 |
-- R. Heinlein |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives