1 |
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:41:33AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 28 July 2012 21:19:44 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I use both: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Me too (sorry), though I find myself using oldconfig more often than |
7 |
> menuconfig these days, unless I want to comb right through the config |
8 |
> looking for things I could improve. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > first oldconfig to find the newly added stuff...then menuconfig, mostly |
11 |
> > looking for driver pages that have lots of things set - I can't |
12 |
> > possibly have all of that hardware so logically few things must be |
13 |
> > set. menuconfig also lets me easily see things I hve never explicitly |
14 |
> > set (which oldconfig can't do) and labels them (NEW) which is |
15 |
> > distinctly different to what oldconfig calls new stuff |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Is it really? I thought they ought to be the same. And the only snag |
18 |
> with menuconfig for finding new options is that you have to navigate every |
19 |
> single menu - quite time-consuming*. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> > And in menuconfig, the / key engages search, just like in vim |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Ah. I knew about the ? key since it's in the prompt. Seems I can drop |
24 |
> the shift. Ta. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> * Speaking of consuming time, would someone with an i7 please tell me |
27 |
> how long it takes to compile a new kernel? I'd like to compare it with |
28 |
> my i5, which after mrproper and copying the .config in from /boot, where |
29 |
> I store it for safe keeping, was 2 min 7 sec just now. (This is related |
30 |
> to another thread; perhaps I should have asked this there instead.) |
31 |
|
32 |
Just by way of comparison, my Centrino laptop does it in about an hour flat. |
33 |
|
34 |
Terry |