1 |
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
>>> Is ejabberd difficult to run over the internet safely? |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> I doubt it. But you'd want to give the docs a thorough reading to make |
5 |
>> sure you have security questions locked down properly. Off the top of |
6 |
>> my head...don't allow remote registrations (i.e. don't allow clients |
7 |
>> to create accounts). Require SSL/TLS. Always make sure you're up on |
8 |
>> the latest security patches. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Beyond that, you'd have to read docs. Which is what a lot of |
11 |
>> self-described sysadmins can't be bothered to do. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Fair enough. It sounds like IRC is especially tricky with regard to |
14 |
> security but ejabberd isn't. |
15 |
|
16 |
Dunno about that. You can set up IRC to be "authorized-users only" as |
17 |
well. I imagine the only real difference for you would be the variety |
18 |
of software clients your users have available to them. |
19 |
|
20 |
(Also, as an aside, I've been at places with internal XMPP and with |
21 |
internal IRC. I've found internal IRC to be far more flexible and |
22 |
comfortable.) |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
:wq |