Archives
Archives
| From: | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Are multiple emerges safe? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:33:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 43DD08E1.6040501@mid.email-server.info | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Are multiple emerges safe? by Michael Sullivan |
||
| 1 | Michael Sullivan wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Keep in mind though that multiple emerges will share resources, so each |
| 4 | > process may lose speed... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Something that I always wondered about - does it |
| 7 | actually *lose* speed? IOW: Is it, *IN* *TOTAL* |
| 8 | slower to do multiple emerges in parallel compared |
| 9 | to doing them sequentially? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Alexander Skwar |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | The savior becomes the victim. |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Are multiple emerges safe? | Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Are multiple emerges safe? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re[2]: [gentoo-user] Are multiple emerges safe? | Alexander Grebenkov <grebenkov@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Are multiple emerges safe? | Michael Smith <michael@××××××××.com> |