1 |
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:51:29 +0100, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 19:26:56 Mick wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > Peter, I recall you being a long term sufferer of Kmail2 problems, which I |
5 |
> > do not experience here. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Yes, I have some old archives preserved as tar.bz2 files, but I can't import |
8 |
> them into KMail because of some internal damage to many of the messages. I |
9 |
> think the damage was caused by a gradually developing hardware problem |
10 |
> (which has eventually forced me into replacing the whole box), and KMail, |
11 |
> akonadi and friends can't handle the mess. They aren't what I would call |
12 |
> defensively programmed. They either throw wobblers or refuse to co-operate |
13 |
> at all. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> So I have the basic data and can use standard tools to examine them if |
16 |
> necessary; that will have to do for now. Meanwhile, KMail is working happily |
17 |
> with stuff originating on the new box - apart from the apparently inevitable |
18 |
> duplicate messages of course. |
19 |
|
20 |
You could just try notmuch. Extract your tarball and run "notmuch new" on that - |
21 |
of course you want to configure notmuch before that, "man notmuch" may help. |
22 |
If it doesn't throw any errors you can try some basic queries like |
23 |
"notmuch search subject:MUA" to see if indexing went fine. |
24 |
You could try https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid as a frontend. It supports |
25 |
HTML-Mails, is highly configurable and completely keyboard-driven but still |
26 |
requires webkit-gtk:3... |
27 |
|
28 |
Happy testing ;) |