1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:25 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Nikos |
2 |
Chantziaras did opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > About two months ago I did reboot into a gentoo kernel and things did |
5 |
> > feel a little different but not in a way I could put my fingers on. I |
6 |
> > put it down to running a huge compile in screen. I do feel the |
7 |
> > incremental improvements in KDE since about 4.3, mostly because new |
8 |
> > versions come out rapidly. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > What do you perceive with BFS vs mainline/gentoo/whatever? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Less stalls in animations. A classic example is mplayer stalling when I |
13 |
> move the mouse over the clock to the right of the system tray in KDE. |
14 |
> KDE will fade-in a pop-up that contains details about the current date. |
15 |
> For the duration of the fade-in, mplayer will stop playing frames. |
16 |
> This is a "stall." It seems that the compositor of KDE gets way more |
17 |
> CPU than it should resulting in mplayer starving for CPU. With BFS, |
18 |
> this does not happen. |
19 |
|
20 |
I'm running 2.6.36-ck-r2 and mplayer is smooth as a baby's backside - KDE |
21 |
animations have no effect on that. The two things that do slow my desktop down |
22 |
are when nepomuk decides to do it's thing (and I still haven't found a way to |
23 |
tweak how aggresively it does that) and when kontact can't find the imap |
24 |
server on Exchange. |
25 |
|
26 |
It's been so long since I used a vanilla or gentoo kernel I honestly can't |
27 |
recall what it was like. And testing it means a reboot. Hopefully when I next |
28 |
reboot I'll remember what to compare against. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |