1 |
On 11/20/2010 10:55 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:25 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Nikos |
3 |
> Chantziaras did opine thusly: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>>> About two months ago I did reboot into a gentoo kernel and things did |
6 |
>>> feel a little different but not in a way I could put my fingers on. I |
7 |
>>> put it down to running a huge compile in screen. I do feel the |
8 |
>>> incremental improvements in KDE since about 4.3, mostly because new |
9 |
>>> versions come out rapidly. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> What do you perceive with BFS vs mainline/gentoo/whatever? |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Less stalls in animations. A classic example is mplayer stalling when I |
14 |
>> move the mouse over the clock to the right of the system tray in KDE. |
15 |
>> KDE will fade-in a pop-up that contains details about the current date. |
16 |
>> For the duration of the fade-in, mplayer will stop playing frames. |
17 |
>> This is a "stall." It seems that the compositor of KDE gets way more |
18 |
>> CPU than it should resulting in mplayer starving for CPU. With BFS, |
19 |
>> this does not happen. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I'm running 2.6.36-ck-r2 and mplayer is smooth as a baby's backside - KDE |
22 |
> animations have no effect on that. |
23 |
|
24 |
2.6.36-ck-r2 has BFS as scheduler. I thought your were *not* using BFS :-P |