Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI - 2.6.38 desktop responsiveness patch + how to do it now
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 21:09:48
Message-Id: ic9ddg$k3r$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI - 2.6.38 desktop responsiveness patch + how to do it now by Alan McKinnon
1 On 11/20/2010 10:55 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:25 on Saturday 20 November 2010, Nikos
3 > Chantziaras did opine thusly:
4 >
5 >>> About two months ago I did reboot into a gentoo kernel and things did
6 >>> feel a little different but not in a way I could put my fingers on. I
7 >>> put it down to running a huge compile in screen. I do feel the
8 >>> incremental improvements in KDE since about 4.3, mostly because new
9 >>> versions come out rapidly.
10 >>>
11 >>> What do you perceive with BFS vs mainline/gentoo/whatever?
12 >>
13 >> Less stalls in animations. A classic example is mplayer stalling when I
14 >> move the mouse over the clock to the right of the system tray in KDE.
15 >> KDE will fade-in a pop-up that contains details about the current date.
16 >> For the duration of the fade-in, mplayer will stop playing frames.
17 >> This is a "stall." It seems that the compositor of KDE gets way more
18 >> CPU than it should resulting in mplayer starving for CPU. With BFS,
19 >> this does not happen.
20 >
21 > I'm running 2.6.36-ck-r2 and mplayer is smooth as a baby's backside - KDE
22 > animations have no effect on that.
23
24 2.6.36-ck-r2 has BFS as scheduler. I thought your were *not* using BFS :-P

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FYI - 2.6.38 desktop responsiveness patch + how to do it now Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>