Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: TCP Queuing problem
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:30:53
Message-Id: CAN0CFw1mc5f5hzvLChkxUybx_B95hLjPhHXjBVd6ptWhpikrug@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: TCP Queuing problem by Kai Krakow
1 >> >> It looks like the TCP Queuing spike itself was due to imapproxy
2 >> >> which I've now disabled. I'll post more info as I gather it.
3 >> >
4 >> >
5 >> > imapproxy was clearly affecting the TCP Queuing graph in munin but I
6 >> > still ended up with a massive TCP Queuing spike today and
7 >> > corresponding http response time issues long after I disabled
8 >> > imapproxy. Graph attached. I'm puzzled.
9 >>
10 >>
11 >> I just remembered that our AT&T modem/router does not respond to
12 >> pings. My solution is to move PPPoE off of that device and onto my
13 >> Gentoo router so that pings pass through the AT&T device to the Gentoo
14 >> router but I haven't done that yet as I want to be on-site for it.
15 >> Could that behavior somehow be contributing to this problem? There
16 >> does seem to be a clear correlation between user activity at that
17 >> location and the bad server behavior.
18 >
19 > If that device behaves badly in router mode by blocking just all icmp
20 > traffic instead of only icmp-echo-req, this is a good idea. You may
21 > want to bug AT&T about this problem then. It should really not block
22 > related icmp traffic.
23
24
25 Hi Kai, yesterday I switched my Gentoo router over to handling PPPoE
26 and pings seem to be working properly now. The AT&T device is now
27 functioning as a modem only and passing everything through. Today
28 I'll find out if it helps with TCP Queuing and (supposedly) related
29 http response slowdowns.
30
31 - Grant

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: TCP Queuing problem Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com>