| 1 |
James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > > So /usr/portage/dev-python is around 1500 packages. Is it time to |
| 5 |
> > > create some new categories to reduce this size, or is it ok, in the |
| 6 |
> > > "gentoo-way" for everything /python/ to be lumped into dev-python/? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> > I think you have asked this question on the wrong mailing list. |
| 9 |
> > gentoo-dev would be more appropriate. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> It is rhetorical in nature:: just looking for ideas and wise guidance from |
| 12 |
> some other old farts and youngsters. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Wow, we are now getting close to a portage tree /dev-python/ audit and |
| 15 |
discussion? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
From the gentoo-dev list:: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> dev-python/configshell |
| 20 |
> dev-python/rtslib |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I looked at whether these should be owned by the Python team, but I |
| 23 |
don't think they should be. It looks like they're low-level utilities |
| 24 |
that happen to be written in Python. As such, they probably shouldn't |
| 25 |
even be in dev-python. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
(OH)- (S0)- close..... |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Really, somebody with a bit more python expertise than me should really |
| 30 |
put forward this discussion on gentoo_dev..... |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
James |
Archives