1 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym <at> gentoo.org> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> > So /usr/portage/dev-python is around 1500 packages. Is it time to |
5 |
> > create some new categories to reduce this size, or is it ok, in the |
6 |
> > "gentoo-way" for everything /python/ to be lumped into dev-python/? |
7 |
|
8 |
> > We do not organize things around 'C' like that, so since python is |
9 |
> > ubiquitous in linux now, does it make since to treat /python/ |
10 |
> > differently that we do bash or C ? |
11 |
|
12 |
> > Or am I miss reading this portage tree organizational wisdom? |
13 |
> > I understand it and agree with it for one-off languages, but |
14 |
> > surely python has passed that point? |
15 |
|
16 |
> I think you have asked this question on the wrong mailing list. |
17 |
> gentoo-dev would be more appropriate. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
It is rhetorical in nature:: just looking for ideas and wise guidance from |
21 |
some other old farts and youngsters. |
22 |
|
23 |
Besides the bike-shedding on GD sometimes includes the throwing of |
24 |
gears and sprockets so it's safer to see what folks think here. |
25 |
If I'm lucky, a gentoo dev will re-formulate the idea, add a wee bit of |
26 |
deeper (git) thought to it and then re-master it as his own idea........ |
27 |
|
28 |
Furthermore, some other categories are growing large too, so there |
29 |
does seem to be some logical need to define, as least qualitatively, |
30 |
the criteria when a portage tree category needs to be split. Or |
31 |
at least mention some motivational categorization monikers related as |
32 |
to how and why categories are defined in the first place. |
33 |
|
34 |
Maybe it's already unofficially part of the PMS? |
35 |
A future GLEP? |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
;-) |
40 |
James |