| 1 |
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 14:45, Andrea Conti <alyf@××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Is it true that tgt will replace IET? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Last time someone asked that question on the IET mailing list the answer |
| 8 |
> was "no". I can't find the relevant thread right now but I think the |
| 9 |
> general idea was that IET concentrates on code stability (thus no |
| 10 |
> inclusion in the kernel sources) and enterprise-oriented features, while |
| 11 |
> STGT follows kernel development and supports lots of fancy things. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Also, I think there is/was at least a partial overlap in the developers |
| 14 |
> behind the two projects. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > If true, are there any links/howtos/tutorial on using tgt? And tuning it? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I would start from the project home page, http://stgt.sourceforge.net/ |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> HTH, |
| 21 |
> andrea |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Ahh, thanks for the explanation. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I'd go the IET route, then; I value stability over features. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Rgds, |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Pandu E Poluan |
| 31 |
~ IT Optimizer ~ |
| 32 |
Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com |
Archives