Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] package version notification (~/+)?
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 02:17:18
Message-Id: yu9wtauazny.fsf@nyu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] package version notification (~/+)? by "John J. Foster"
1 At Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:06:07 -0400 "John J. Foster" <Gentoo-User@××××××××××××.com> wrote:
2
3 > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:07:24PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
4 >>
5 >> No, but if you put a specific version in /etc/portage/package.keywords,
6 >> only that version will be installed from testing. It will only be
7 >> upgraded when a newer version goes stable.
8 >
9 > Neil - I _think_ this is what I have not been able to understand for
10 > over a year now. I run an almost entirely stable system, and want to
11 > keep it that way. But occassionally there is something I want that is
12 > currently ~x86, for instance amarok. So what you're saying is that if I
13 >
14 > #echo =media-sound/amarok-1.4.0a-r1 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
15 >
16 > I will not get the next testing version of amarok, but will get the next
17 > stable?
18
19 Yes. The line you are adding to package.keywords says that for *the
20 specific version listed* (since you begin with "=") you will emerge
21 it, if it is keyworded (or stable). For any other version, in
22 particular for the next version issued from upstream, the line you
23 added says nothing. Hence, since you are running a stable system,
24 only stable versions (except for 1.4.0a-r1) are eligible for emerging.
25
26 allan
27 --
28 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] package version notification (~/+)? "John J. Foster" <Gentoo-User@××××××××××××.com>