1 |
Hi there, |
2 |
|
3 |
I have a couple of customers for whom I've configured Samba running |
4 |
on Linux as their file-servers. We want to do off-site back-up & I |
5 |
like the idea of http://www.rsync.net/ which I read as recommended by |
6 |
a user here or on Slashdot some considerable time ago. |
7 |
|
8 |
However I'm not clear on the best way to secure our data when storing |
9 |
it on their servers - it's great to be able to use an open-source / |
10 |
open-standards protocol such as SSH when transferring data, but this |
11 |
does not protect it in the event that the off-site servers are |
12 |
compromised. I am sure this isn't likely to happen but still it's |
13 |
something we must consider. |
14 |
|
15 |
It seems to me that we can stuff all our data in a tarball & encrypt |
16 |
it using PGP or similar (probably a symmetric algorithm (??) rather |
17 |
than PGP, but you get the idea) but that would seem to prevent |
18 |
incremental back-ups - using conventional back-up tools the single |
19 |
encrypted tarball will be seen to have changed each night and so will |
20 |
require completely uploading. Since our data could easily comprise |
21 |
several gigs this is clearly unwieldy, and encrypting thousands of |
22 |
single files and storing them remotely would seem to me to be clumsy |
23 |
also. |
24 |
|
25 |
Does anyone have any thoughts on this, please? |
26 |
|
27 |
I have read of zsync which allows only the changes in a large single |
28 |
file to be propagated but I'm not really sure if it's suitable for |
29 |
these purposes. |
30 |
|
31 |
Thanks in advance for any suggestions, |
32 |
|
33 |
Stroller. |
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |