1 |
Holly Bostick wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Well, since I just (literally, 10 minutes ago) emerged |
4 |
> mozilla-firefox-1.0.6-r2, and had no problems on a 32-bit system, I must |
5 |
> suspect that this is a 64-bit issue. |
6 |
|
7 |
Nope. I emerged both firefox and thunderbird without issue on my AMD64 |
8 |
4000+ about 14 hours ago. |
9 |
|
10 |
> In that regard, I see at least one thing in your emerge info that has |
11 |
> been called into question for 64-bit users in recent threads: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> CFLAGS="-march=k8 |
14 |
|
15 |
I use k8. k8, opteron, etc., etc. are supposed to be synonyms as I |
16 |
understand it. k8 is the preferred one according to most sources I have |
17 |
read but, if they are truly synonyms, I'm not sure why one should be |
18 |
preferred over another. |
19 |
|
20 |
> Oh, and despite what Patrick said, I think you were right to post here |
21 |
> first-- no need to clog up b.g.o with what might be a configuration |
22 |
> problem and waste developer's time closing an invalid bug. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> I think it's always wise to try to make sure that it really is a bug |
25 |
> before posting it. |
26 |
|
27 |
Quite right. I doubt that it is a bug - more likely a broken system in |
28 |
some way. |
29 |
|
30 |
> the other person who mentioned using march=k8 said that |
31 |
> that was the recommendation of the docs, but that seems to no longer be |
32 |
> the case, if people using this flag are regularly receiving compilation |
33 |
> errors |
34 |
|
35 |
No errors here. :) |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
Be lucky, |
39 |
|
40 |
Neil |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |