Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Justin <justin@×××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a Netbook satisfactorily on Gentoo?
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:44:01
Message-Id: 49B965E4.1080602@j-schmitz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a Netbook satisfactorily on Gentoo? by Paul Hartman
1 Paul Hartman schrieb:
2 > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Justin <justin@×××××××××.net> wrote:
3 >> Grant schrieb:
4 >>>>> I've installed and updated Gentoo on my girlfriend's Acer Aspire One
5 >>>>> netbook and it's just so slow. The only things I can think of to
6 >>>>> speed it up would be to upgrade the RAM from 1GB (not sure if that's
7 >>>>> possible) and/or swap out the SSD for a HD. Anyone running a netbook
8 >>>>> not excruciatingly slow?
9 >>>>>
10 >>>>> - Grant
11 >>>>>
12 >>>> I've got an Acer One for my father. I don't know the exact type; it is
13 >>>> the one with the 8GB SSD.
14 >>>>
15 >>>> I found it quiet usable, installed Gentoo with a minimal KDE3 on it.
16 >>>> Compiled with -Os, of course. RAM usage is below 256MB most of the time.
17 >>>> The only things I didn't get to work are 3D acceleration and the SSD
18 >>>> card slots but I haven't invested much time into it.
19 >>>>
20 >>>> The slowest part of the system is the SSD. It really slows things done
21 >>>> when they are loaded for the first time (for example the HTML part of
22 >>>> Konqueror takes 3s to load AFTER Konqueror itself came up).
23 >>>>
24 >>>> The rest of the system is pretty fast for my expectations.I compiled
25 >>>> most things in a chroot on my Celeron notebook (2 or 3 times the speed)
26 >>>> before moving it over but I really found compiling not _that_ slow. Its
27 >>>> usable for most regular updates and even kernels and such alike. For
28 >>>> larger packages, I mount an NFS share on /var/tmp/portage because I
29 >>>> don't want to wear down the SSD.
30 >>>>
31 >>>> Other tips:
32 >>>> Use ext2 FS. You don't want the journalling to cost you even more
33 >>>> performance and wear down the SSD.
34 >>>>
35 >>>> I wouldn't use laptop-mode. You don't want it to bog down the system
36 >>>> when it decides to flush its write cache.
37 >>>>
38 >>>> No syslog, it will only wear down the disk with many small write cycles.
39 >>>>
40 >>>> Use the noop IO scheduler (boot parameter elevator=noop). There is no
41 >>>> need for a scheduler on an SSD.
42 >>>>
43 >>>> ArchLinux also recommends deactivating DRI ('Option "DRI" "0"' in
44 >>>> xorg.conf) to free up 32MB of memory.
45 >>>>
46 >>>> Hope this helps.
47 >>> Thanks guys, these are the kinds of tips I need. I really want this
48 >>> thing to work out so I can switch over to one. Lemme see if I've got
49 >>> this:
50 >>>
51 >>> 1. run xfce4 (already do)
52 >>> 2. compile with -Os (I was using -O2)
53 >>> 3. use ext2 (I was using ext3)
54 >>> 4. don't use laptop-mode (I didn't know it existed)
55 >>> 5. no syslog (does this mean don't even emerge a system logger like metalog?)
56 >>> 6. use elevator=noop at boot
57 >>> 7. deactivate DRI
58 >>> 8. upgrade RAM to the max
59 >> 9. use distcc
60 >
61 > Won't that require another machine using the same CPU arch? Or can
62 > cross-compiler be setup on the remote distcc box?
63 I am using it cross x86 and amd64,
64 http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/cross-compiling-distcc.xml
65 > (I don't even know
66 > if GCC has an atom-specific CPU or if it is using something more
67 > generic)
68 CFLAGS="-march=prescott -mssse3"
69 nearly same as core2 in 32bit mode

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature