| 1 |
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 2 |
> > I'm not here to start a war over the merits of any one MTA... but I |
| 3 |
> > think it's worth reading DJBs rebuttal of the accusations made by |
| 4 |
> > Postfix's author. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well, that page that I quoted from is NOT from the Postfix |
| 7 |
> author. It's from somebody else. Also, the page you mentioned |
| 8 |
> is from no later than 1998, it seems. My page was from 2006 (!), |
| 9 |
> so it really seems as if nothing has been changed in qmail in |
| 10 |
> 8 years! Not really convincing, if you ask me. Finally, the |
| 11 |
> 500$ offer isn't worth anything, as it's not awarded, although |
| 12 |
> it should've been. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And in closing, I'd like to just add, that the personality of |
| 15 |
> DJB also doesn't make qmail or his software favorable to me. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Anyway - I stand to what I wrote. I'd suggest any MTA, *BESIDES* |
| 18 |
> qmail and sendmail. qmail, as it's too buggy, too few features |
| 19 |
> and too "complicated". sendmail, as the configuration is a nightmare |
| 20 |
> (compared to easier systems available nowadays). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Anyhow, now the OP can make a semi-informed decision. As previously |
| 23 |
stated I would recommend Postfix. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-Mike |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
________________________________ |
| 29 |
Michael E. Crute |
| 30 |
http://mike.crute.org |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended |
| 33 |
up where I intended to be. --Douglas Adams |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives