| 1 |
On Mittwoch 30 Dezember 2009, Albert Hopkins wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 00:08 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 |
> > just think a moment of the tons of bug fixes constantly going into |
| 4 |
> > ext4. That |
| 5 |
> > crap is not stable. Pre-alpha maybe. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> People say this from time to time, yet I have been running ext4 on my |
| 8 |
> root directory of my laptop since July 2008. The only problem I've had |
| 9 |
> since then is one time it would not mount on boot. I merely had to fsck |
| 10 |
> it from a live media an then it was ok (nothing lost or currupted). But |
| 11 |
> that was a long time ago when it was still ext4dev. And I've had |
| 12 |
> numerous crashes and battery depletions on the laptop without incident. |
| 13 |
> So the pre-alpha FUD that some people are spreading is either not true |
| 14 |
> or I just happen to be the luckiest ext4 user in the world :-). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
tell that to the people who got their configs zeroed because extX devs value |
| 18 |
benchmarks at default settings as more important than your data. |
Archives