1 |
Thanks for your responses, all. |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:30:22 -0800 |
5 |
kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net> wrote: |
6 |
|
7 |
> First off don't assign separate IPs to each port on your four port |
8 |
> card, bond them into a single interface. That will simplify your |
9 |
> config and perform better. |
10 |
|
11 |
Perhaps I will; that's not a bad idea. However, I will still have |
12 |
another interface that is to handle non-NFS traffic. (The reason I |
13 |
split it this way, by the way, is that NFS is the only network service |
14 |
that might potentially be limited by bandwith. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Second, what sort of routing are you doing? If all the clients are on |
17 |
> the same subnet as the four port card you should not need routing. |
18 |
> Additionally if they are on the same subnet you should not be limited |
19 |
> by the speed of your gateway which may or may not be able to route at |
20 |
> 4 Gb/s whereas your switch may actually have that sort of |
21 |
> performaance. Are the clients on a separate subnet and if so can you |
22 |
> put them on the same subnet? |
23 |
|
24 |
No, they're all on the same subnet. Each of the 5 interfaces adds a |
25 |
route to that subnet (no gateway, as you said, it's the same broadcast |
26 |
domain) but the routes all have different metrics. The first such |
27 |
route chosen is the one that gets all the traffic. The NFS server is |
28 |
used primarily for Read access, so this routing problem does a pretty |
29 |
good job mitigating any benefit of having so many interfaces. |
30 |
|
31 |
Oh, by the way, this is 100-T, not Gigabit. Do I sound rich to |
32 |
you : ) ? |
33 |
|
34 |
So, let's say I bond the 4 together. Now I have 2 interfaces, a bond |
35 |
and eth0. I still need to route through one or the other, so I still |
36 |
have the problem. |
37 |
|
38 |
I am reading about policy routing, which should be able to solve the |
39 |
problem by allowing routing based on the source rather than the |
40 |
destination. I will keep the lists informed... |
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |